No Man is an Island: Court rules that arbitrators need not live in splendid isolation!

A party who received an adverse arbitration award hired a private investigator to determine if the arbitrator had failed to disclose certain professional relationships with one party that might have indicated that he was not neutral. Those relationships were bar association committee memberships, among other things.

The losing party contended that if he’d known of these facts, he would have disqualified the arbitrator. Hence, he argued, the adverse award should have been vacated.

The appellate court in Nemecek & Cole v Horn (July 23, 2012) Court of Appeals Case No. B233274, reminds us that ordinary and insubstantial business dealings arising from participation in the business or legal communities do not necessarily require disclosure.

However, if such dealings are substantial and involve financial and other considerations creating an impression of possible bias, they must be disclosed.

In this case, the Second Appellate District ruled that mere participation in bar association committees with members of a law firm in an arbitration is not enough to warrant disclosure or disqualification.

The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Reid & Hellyer, APC or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.